M Booysen v J Dolley-Major (Case No: 5043/2021) Landmark case – Naming an alleged rapist on social media

By |2021-11-24T14:42:36+00:00November 24th, 2021|Litigation, Social Media law|

It is important that each defamation matter be consider on its own set of facts. A defamation matter is never a clear-cut court case, and you should consider your legal routes carefully before proceeding. The case entitled M Booysen v J Dolley-Major (Case No: 5043/2021) in a landmark defamation case to consider.

The consequences of the Cybercrimes Act on Social Media (ab)use

By |2021-06-14T08:45:05+01:00June 10th, 2021|Cyber Crime and Insurance, ICT Law, Social Media law|

The Cybercrimes Act (the Act) focuses mainly on criminalising the interference with computer systems and data, which is described in more detail in Andrew Marshall’s article on the subject. However, the Act also has bearing on the way we use (and often abuse) social media which will have an impact on the general public. What you share on social media platforms, including WhatsApp and WhatsApp groups, could now land you in jail if we consider the sections relating to “malicious communications” in the Act.

The Importance of a Social Media Policy

By |2020-10-13T07:22:56+01:00October 13th, 2020|ICT Law, ICT Law, Social Media law|

An employer having a social media policy should not restrict employees from using social media but rather be a tool to equip employees on how to use social media in the most beneficial manner and to ensure that anything that is said  on social media platforms, whether or not it is about the employer and even if it is after office hours – does not bring the employer into disrepute.

Go to Top